On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:33 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>>
>>> Do you still have the patch. I remember applying one patch from you
>>> and rejecting one that I thought would break certain expressions. If
>>> you resend it I will double check.
>>
>> You applied the patch to test_template.py, which was also broken.
>>
>> I need to update it, since template.py has changed since I sent it last time.
>>
>> A problem is that we don't have a good test case. The unit test doesn't have
>> any embedded newlines, which is what re_strings is all about.
>>
>> Back in a minute.
>
> This is for testing: http://web.me.com/jlundell/filechute/template.zip
>
> I do not understand one part of the pattern. For example:
>
> + r"'(?!'')(?:[^'\\]+|\\.)*'"
>
> Why do we need the |\\. ? What function is it serving? It seems to make the
> alternation useless. Also, I'm not sure why we're escaping the right square
> bracket.
Never mind. Now I see what it's doing. If this works, I'll add some comments so
it's not quite so opaque....
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 7, 7:43 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've looked at this problem extensively and I'm convinced that the
>>>>> solution is to re-implement template.py without complicated regexps or
>>>>> remove the claim of Jython support.
>>>>
>>>>> The exact problem is related to the size of a view that is run through
>>>>> the template module. The "re_strings" as it is used in the parse()
>>>>> method is too complicated. A temporary solution is to comment out that
>>>>> line but templates will not render some Javascript properly.
>>>>
>>>> re_strings looks just plain broken to me. The inner parens should not be
>>>> capturing, there should be non-capturing parens around the alternation,
>>>> and the single-line quote patterns shouldn't have dots in the match.
>>>>
>>>> I think.
>>>>
>>>> I sent a patch for this back in November, and Timothy reported that it
>>>> worked. But it never got applied.
>>>>
>>>> Want to try again?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> This is ultimately a bug in Java (not even Jython) but it officially has
>>>>> WONT-FIX status with Sun.
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/7/2010 3:34 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 12:44 PM, John Cobo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I have not written any regular expressions. So far I am just trying to
>>>>>>> run the web2py "welcome" app.
>>>>
>>>>>>> The only reg. exp. is what creates the welcome page view.
>>>>
>>>>>> No traceback?
>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7 Apr 2010 19:29, "Jonathan Lundell" <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:55 AM, JC11 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am getting the dreaded error:
>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am using web2py vsn. 1.76.5, jython version 2.5.1 on Windows XP.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have altered the web2py 'welcome' application defaault controller
>>>>>>>>> to: return 'Hello World' rather than return dict(message=T('Hello
>>>>>>>>> World')).
>>>>>>>>> This solved the recursion problem, but only if one does not use web2py
>>>>>>>>> views :(
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried adding the following to the default controller, but it did not
>>>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>>>> import sys
>>>>>>>>> sys.setrecursionlimit(2500)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions ?
>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's the regex that's causing the problem?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 4:16 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:14 AM, mdipierro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Some people have reported problems with Jython due to a bug in Java
>>>>>>>>>>> regex. I tried Jython2.5rc2 and it worked for me. Let us know.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One or two of the regex patches a while back (URL checking IIRC) was
>>>>>>>>>> aimed at preventing excessive backtracking under Jython. If anyone
>>>>>>>>>> runs into that problem again, they should report it. I'm pretty sure
>>>>>>>>>> I understand how to avoid at least the problem we had then, by
>>>>>>>>>> making alternations mutually exclusive.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 6:14 am, JC11 <john.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sure I searched in the 'book', how silly of me not to find it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What about Oracle and Jython ? The last line of the entrie reads:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'You will be able to use DAL('sqlite://...') and
>>>>>>>>>>>> DAL('postgres://...') only.'
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> John C.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 11:54 am, Kuba Kucharski <kuba.kuchar...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here they are:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://web2py.com/book/default/section/12/9
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + use newest stable
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kuba
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "web2py-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
