Hi Mark, The idea with symlinks might work, although it's not very elegant.
Packaging individual applications is not easy either, there is another problem I forgot to mention. Currently web2py assumes that it has write permissions for the whole web2py directories (including subdirectories). It creates various files inside the application's directory - databases, error tickets, session-related files, and so on. That would never work with a debian package, all runtime files should be created under /var/run. In short, the web2py code should be able to run from a read-only directory structure. I guess it'll take a fair amount of work to achieve this, I don't feel confident enough to do this on my own. Any volunteers? Regards, Dima. On Mar 21, 3:08 pm, Mark Breedveld <m.breedv...@solcon.nl> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > > Aldo my first reply suggested that I wanted to seperate the admin app. > This not my intention. > With web2py-<appname>.deb was for verified user apps from web2py.com. > > But still your interpretation of it ain't an wrong idee. > For securite and vps reasons/situations it's required to run in there > own directory. > > So if possible, we could link the application to user directory > which means that every user that is running web2py will get a web2py > directory. > somethink like. > /home/<user>/web2py/ > which contains a symlink to following directories > /usr/local/bin/web2py/gluon/ > /usr/local/bin/web2py/scripts/ > and the following files > /usr/local/bin/web2py/web2py.py > and all other user independent files /*massimo knows which files that > would be > create directory > /home/<user>/web2py/application > put a symlink to > /usr/local/bin/web2py/application/admin/ > then put under > /home/<user>/web2py/ > parameters_8000.py > > Then create a start up entry for that user. > > There are a few problems with this plan. > Does every user has his own web2py? > Has web2py problems with symlinks? > Is the symlink a real bottleneck for web2py and should there be a > hardlink? > Are the directories accoording the ubuntu guidlines? > > I fairly interested in your opinion. > > regards Mark Breedveld, > > On Mar 21, 1:15 pm, Dima Barsky <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 5:01 pm, Mark Breedveld <m.breedv...@solcon.nl> wrote: > > > > The web2py community is searching help ondebian/ ubuntu packaging. > > > The are concrete plans to deploy web2py as Turnkey Appliance. > > > Mark, > > > I'll see what I can do, although it might be not straightforward. > > There is no clear separation in web2py between the library code and > > the user code. Take, for example, the admin application: it is > > located under the applications directory nearby the user code, but > > it's really part of the core, as web2py refuses to start without it. > > > I would say the first step should be to patch web2py to allow the user > > code to be located somewhere else, not in the web2py directory, which > > is currently not possible. I'll give it a go, but I'm not very > > familiar with web2py internals, so I would appreciate a bit of help > > from somebody more experienced. Once this is done, the actual > > packaging will be quite simple. > > > Regards, > > Dima. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
