What about testing this with Selenium[1]? You can use many browsers as "plugins" (IE, Safari, Firefox etc.). There is a Python wrapper[2]. There is a project made by brazilians (at Globo.com) that translates "natural language" to Selenium commands, called pyccuracy[3] - it could help too.
[1] http://seleniumhq.org/ [2] http://jimmyg.org/blog/2009/getting-started-with-selenium-and-python.html [3] http://www.pyccuracy.org/ On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 17:25, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > That was FF 3.6 on Win7. I'm going to try some less well behaved browsers > (IE 5.5+ via IEtester) next. > > On 3/11/2010 2:21 PM, mdipierro wrote: >> >> Which browsers? The problem with cherrypy< 3.x was for example that >> different browser treated in different ways the server delay and some >> browser truncated files on download. I want to make sure that all >> common browsers are tested. >> >> Massimo >> >> On Mar 11, 2:18 pm, Timothy Farrell<tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Slight correction: >>> >>> db.define_table('image',Field('upload', 'upload')) >>> >>> I have successfully up- and downloaded files as large as 480MB and apps >>> as large as 160MB (any larger apps crashed on unzipping). In all cases >>> I was testing over HTTPS. >>> >>> -tim >>> >>> On 3/11/2010 1:04 PM, mdipierro wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Rocket 0.3.1 is IN. Please download from trunk and start testing. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Use this code >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> db.define_table('image',Field('upload')) >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Please test upload and download of a large files via appadmin into >>>> "image" table. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Please let us know which browser you tested and whether it worked or >>>> you experience any problem. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Massimo >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 11, 12:24 pm, Timothy Farrell<tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For a production system, I'm more interested in stability than >>>>>> performance. And despite the admitted arbitrariness of version-numbering >>>>>> choices, it's hard to make the case to management that moving to an 0.x >>>>>> server is safe. >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What do *you* mean by labeling Rocket 0.x? >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> That's a fair question. When I started, I had a certain set of features >>>>> and goals that I planned to reach. Upon finishing all of those >>>>> features >>>>> and goal, there would be a 1.0 release. Since starting at least three >>>>> of these goals have fallen by the wayside due to their improbability or >>>>> lack of flexibility withing Python or the WSGI specification. >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> In the end, I'll probably skip a few 0.x releases and go straight to >>>>> 1.0 >>>>> whenever I feel that there are enough of the features I originally set >>>>> out to include. >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> Like web2py, I strive to make every announced/released version stable >>>>> enough to include in a project. I've been running web2py on different >>>>> versions of Rocket for several months now. >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> -tim >>>>> >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > -- Álvaro Justen - Turicas http://blog.justen.eng.br/ 21 9898-0141 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
