On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:49 AM, John Heenan wrote: > The code I posted does not replace the normal behaviour of BEAUTIFY. > There is choice. In the four line example code I posted (which is from > a web2py slice) the keys are only changed if the second character is > an underscore. > > I accept there is little enthusiasm. It is ironic because I think > there is potential to generalise an approach (such as with functional > hooks as mentioned) and show the framework working in a way that > would generate more interest from the Python community (no web2py at > PyCon). If there was a suitable hook then there would be no need to > modify the BEAUTIFY class in the web2py core.
I've found BEAUTIFY to be quite helpful for debugging and prototyping. My main complaint about it is that it's hard to style, and that the default style isn't as readable as it could be. I agree that a more useful BEAUTIFY would be more ... useful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
