On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:34 AM, mdipierro wrote: > send me a patch!
I'd suggest otherwise--in particular interpreting None as "no limit" in the min or max direction. Interpreting (4) as (0,4) saves the developer two characters of typing. But interpreting (4, None) or (None, 4) as no limit extends the functionality of the validator. > > On Feb 8, 10:24 am, "KONTRA, Gergely" <pihent...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> And does it makes sense to make all min and max values optional, so >>>> you can have: enter an integer, which is larger than 2 (witout upper >>>> limit)? >>> Having had the need recently, I would like to see: >>> IS_INT_IN_RANGE(1) # any integer>0 (up to sys.maxint) >>> IS_INT_IN_RANGE(max=10) # any integer less than 10 >>> and similarly for IS_FLOAT_IN_RANGE(). >> >> Following python's range() conventions, IS_INT_IN_RANGE(4) should >> accept ints between 0 and 3. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
