It is not a show stopper and yes web2py creates the missing folders but it needs to be tested more. I will do so. This is in fact a better solution than storing dummy files in empty folders.
What do you mean by "I would much prefer tagging releases as a distinct copies in SVN. "? Massimo On Dec 4, 8:08 am, Fred <fre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 3:42 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > Massimo is pretty good about announcing release versions in svn comments. > > I see now that there are quite a few SVN log entries with release > version numbers. 1.71.3 wasn't there though and so I went with the > process that I outlined above. > > But my process is a kluge. I would much prefer tagging releases as a > distinct copies in SVN. > > And mercurial is even better IMO. I'm surprised that the "empty > folders" issue is a show-stopper. I thought something was done long > ago in web2py to create the necessary empty folders at runtime if > needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
