I would be fine with (2) Do people use examples.w2p? When I need to find something out I search the book and this forum.
On Dec 3, 11:04 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > For the future version of web2py.... > > should we (1) continue to distribute admin.w2p, welcome.wp2, > examples.w2p and unpack them on startup (and require --upgrade=yes on > upgrade) or (2) should we just distribute the applications folder with > unpacked apps? > > The case (2) would simplify lots of stuff and avoid lots of problems. > > I originally choose (1) because I thought people were going to modify > admin and did not want an automatic upgrade of it. Some people for > example edit /applications/admin/models/access.py > > Pros? Cons? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
