Keep us posted. I like mercurial because it is pure Python and we
could integrate further into web2py. Make sure to look into web2py/
applications/admin/controllers/mercurial.py
I also agree we should use external services where available. I am not
good with bookkeeping, backups, etc.

Massimo

On Oct 14, 10:41 am, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
> I will be taking a look at hgwebdir source tonight to see how mercurial
> could integrate further into web2py. This is for personal interest as well
> since I would like to include latest commits on my new homepage along with
> facebook status and whatnot.
>
> If it is a choice between 3rd party, I think we should really consider "what
> we want" and "what we need" and "what we might need" instead of how
> everybody feels about a certain platform.
>
> Having the ability to easily clone the repository, and host it on the same
> site as a clone that could be pushed upstream.
>
> So we don't have to keep mailing Massimo .diff files, he could pull from our
> clones into main.
>
> Also, we need to stay with free services as much as possible. I don't mind
> making contributions, but if I were Massimo, I wouldn't want to be stuck
> with the bill.
>
> -Thadeus
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Kacper Krupa <pageno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would also prefer bitbucket (or even github) instead of Google
> > Code.
> > But the own trac (with hg/git/svn whatever) is the best idea i think.
>
> > On 14 Paź, 06:09, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
> > > What about hgwebdir or roll our own app usinghttp://
> > mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MercurialApiwith our own custom
> > > bug/ticket module?
>
> > > Or we could use trac with mercurial integration?
>
> > > -Thadeus
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > I do not think this is an area where we should eat our own dogfood.
> > > > They probably did it because google code with mercurial was not
> > > > available. The memory limitation is a major issue.
>
> > > > On Oct 13, 7:18 pm, Richard <richar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > bitbucket gives max 150MB for free - would that be a problem?
> > > > > Google Code offers 1024MB, which can be increased if necessary:
> > > >http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2008/12/happy-holidays-from-google-cod.
> > ..
>
> > > > > I noticed the other major Python frameworks have rolled their own SVN
> > > > > solutions:
> > > > > -http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk
> > > > > -http://pylonshq.com/svn/Pylons/trunk
> > > > > -http://svn.turbogears.org/projects/tg.devtools/trunk
>
> > > > > Not saying we should copy them, but it does look more professional to
> > > > > host it from their own domain.
> > > > > Should we be "eating our own dogfood" here too?
>
> > > > > Personally I would prefer Google Code because I am used to it and
> > know
> > > > > it works.
>
> > > > > Richard
>
> > > > > On Oct 13, 12:13 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > can you be more specific?  There is no review process in place the
> > > > likes of
> > > > > > code review on google, and that would go a LONG way to our being
> > able
> > > > to
> > > > > > take input from community, even let community review before proj.
> > leads
> > > > > > (e.g. Massimo) approve and merge into mainlines....
>
> > > > > > I don't think bitbucket is nearly as structured (more wiki-fied).
>
> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Álvaro Justen [Turicas] <
>
> > > > > > alvarojus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 21:00, Yarko Tymciurak <
> > yark...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > also - bitbucket does not have the review system tied to the
> > > > repository,
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > Guido put in and has been implemented for google code - not to
> > > > mention
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > increased exposure to search for simply being, being reviewed
> > on
> > > > google.
>
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mdipierro <
> > > > mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >> why one over the other? pros, cons?
>
> > > > > > > >> bitbucket had some major downtime last week.
>
> > > > > > > I like BitBucket because it is like GitHub that have a great
> > "social"
> > > > > > > integration - I think it is very important for free software
> > > > projects.
> > > > > > > I don't see it so good in Google Code.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >  Álvaro Justen
> > > > > > >  Peta5 - Telecomunicações e Software Livre
> > > > > > >  21 3021-6001 / 9898-0141
> > > > > > >  http://www.peta5.com.br/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to