I understand that but I was wondering if there was a way to just cache the object without having to call a function, i.e. a way to cache large objects instead of storing them in session or pickling.
For a little background, I'm grafting large trees together. The user would search and view trees to copy what they need to a clipboard and then graft into the super tree later. Since I have already created the trees when searching, I want to cache them. When I go back to the super tree I can do the paste without recreating that copied tree. I think I can do what I want by just caching the method so I was just wondering if I can, or even should, try to cache the object directly. Thanks! Krista On Jul 10, 3:09 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > You alwayscachethe object returned by the function. The function can > be a dummy that returns the object you want tocache. > > On Jul 10, 1:30 pm, krista <klarso...@msn.com> wrote: > > > Is there a way to justcachethe object and not the function? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
