Is there any progress or at least a timeline when web2py will officially 
support Python 3?

It's 11 months since the last web2py release and I don't see much activity 
on github. So this is worrying me a little bit. I have a lot of web2py 
projects and I'll start a large project in a few months. I know web2py very 
well and it's a great framework, but at the moment I'm not completely sure 
if it's a good idea to use it for a new project...

best regards,
Alex

Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2017 18:39:10 UTC+1 schrieb Paolo Valleri:
>
> In the last months few patches have been accepted in the current master 
> branch, as a result web2py core components can be tested on py3 too. Few 
> features are missing see https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353.
> Feel free to try and report/fix any new issue discovered.
>
> Paolo
>
> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 12:11:37 PM UTC+1, Muhammad Hashim Malik 
> wrote:
>>
>> Its about eight months passed but no news about web3py. What's the latest 
>> updated in this regard?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 03:17:46 UTC+5, Dave S wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 1:42:35 PM UTC-7, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Of course though as Massimo cited all education institutions are 
>>>> teaching Python 3 and have for a time meaning all the new developers are 
>>>> starting there. If they write new code bases it will be 3, every dev deals 
>>>> with legacy code but is that really the strongest position to take?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a web3py in the works, although it will be experimental for the 
>>> near future.. IIRC, pydal is already P3 compatible.  SQLFORM goes away in 
>>> web3py, AIUI, and FORM will be better supported.  Switching from Bootstrap 
>>> to other view-ish frameworks should be easier.
>>>
>>> /dps
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 09:38:14 UTC+11, Remco Boerma wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've done my homework and agree Massimo. There is hardly a thing that 
>>>>> requires python3 that doesn't work with python2. The only one i know is 
>>>>> https://micropython.org/ but it's not a big company, nor a "big" 
>>>>> product. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Op woensdag 11 november 2015 16:21:18 UTC+1 schreef Massimo Di Pierro:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As of today python 3 is used almost exclusively in schools. Do you 
>>>>>> know of any large company that uses Python 3? I do not. But I know many 
>>>>>> large companies that use Python 2, including banks.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, 9 November 2015 01:36:40 UTC-6, Remco Boerma wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great one Alex. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While searching for web2py and python3 the first result i got was 
>>>>>>> this 
>>>>>>> <https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/31ai10/web2py_python3/>. 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi...I m total beginner in python with elastic search also Unicode 
>>>>>>>> ... I am looking for a wonderful framework & was keen on web2py..but 
>>>>>>>> just 
>>>>>>>> happened to read that its not compatible with python 3..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pl guide me abt this issue & in selecting framework
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With regards to all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been asked to start a new internship-company for a project i'm 
>>>>>>> involved in. And I so want to take those boys and girls on the web2py 
>>>>>>> path, 
>>>>>>> but to ask of those new-to-the-market to invest in a legacy language 
>>>>>>> (2020 
>>>>>>> is only 4 years from now) is something that feels odd to me. Especially 
>>>>>>> since i know the power and grace of web2py. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know the subject has been debated and debated but for the sake of 
>>>>>>> these students (and these are not the high university kind, but rather 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> ground-work and getting-stuff-done folks) i would kindly ask to take 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> future into consideration as well as our marketing because web2py is 
>>>>>>> simply 
>>>>>>> droped out of the equation because of py2. I would love to teach those 
>>>>>>> kids 
>>>>>>> web2py and be future proof. Many schools already teach things from a 
>>>>>>> hundred years ago, let's not do that in IT as well. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank your for considering. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Op vrijdag 6 november 2015 23:57:33 UTC+1 schreef Alex:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> web2py for python 3 would be great. I hope it comes rather sooner 
>>>>>>>> than later. I'd love to use python 3, no more str <-> unicode nonsense 
>>>>>>>> (which already caused many issues and wasted time for me), type hints 
>>>>>>>> (seems to have good support in PyCharm) and other new features. I 
>>>>>>>> think the 
>>>>>>>> current situation could also scare away potential new users when they 
>>>>>>>> see 
>>>>>>>> that web2py does not support python 3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pyDAL seems to be already compatible with python 3. Is it not 
>>>>>>>> possible to make the remaining parts also compatible or are there 
>>>>>>>> completely new concepts planned? I for one would completely remove the 
>>>>>>>> FORM 
>>>>>>>> code - it's nice and easy to get something up and running but 
>>>>>>>> difficult to 
>>>>>>>> style (no clear separation of backend/frontend) and extend. I'm using 
>>>>>>>> knockout (I guess any data binding js lib will do fine) which is very 
>>>>>>>> flexible and easy to understand. That should be the preferred way to 
>>>>>>>> do 
>>>>>>>> forms and recommended in the book. But that's just my opinion. No more 
>>>>>>>> FORM 
>>>>>>>> would mean less code to port to python 3 ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 4:37:56 PM UTC+1, Ramos wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @massimo 
>>>>>>>>> When will it be available ? 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2015-11-04 14:38 GMT+00:00 Massimo Di Pierro <
>>>>>>>>> massimo....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There will be a new framework similar to web2py for python 3. 
>>>>>>>>>> web2py has to be backward compatible and it is pointless to port it 
>>>>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>>>>> python 3. 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 06:25:40 UTC-6, Jim Gregory wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know this has come up in the past, but it hasn't been asked in 
>>>>>>>>>>> a while. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there ever going to be a usable and maintained 
>>>>>>>>>>> Python3-compatible fork of web2py?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The latest edition of Fedora now ships with Python3 by default. 
>>>>>>>>>>> It's the default version used in Django's tutorial.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not using Python3 now, but I can see the day when I 
>>>>>>>>>>> inevitably will. I don't want to invest the time in a framework if 
>>>>>>>>>>> I know 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll have to abandon it later.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Resources:
>>>>>>>>>> - http://web2py.com
>>>>>>>>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>>>>>>>>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>>>>>>>>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to