I'd like to help maintain it. And I vote for a web2py solution.
Not using would let us in a "shoemaker's son always goes barefoot"
situation.
I think this is embarrassing.

2017-03-22 1:23 GMT-03:00 Kiran Subbaraman <subbaraman.ki...@gmail.com>:

> I agree that the managing web2pyslices as issues may be one way to go.A
> couple of options that I have in mind
>
> *Option 1 / bl.ocks.org <http://bl.ocks.org>*
> But there is another idea that I have been considering for sometime...
> I follow the d3js community once in a while, and they have this nice way
> to contribute and expand on the examples created using d3js. These examples
> are hosted on http://bl.ocks.org. If an example is created on Gist, and
> follows a prescribed template, then it is hosted as an example on
> bl.ocks.org.
>
> The template and process is defined here: https://bl.ocks.org/-/about
>
> The work that the bl.ocks.org application does, needs to be replicated in
> some form by another application in the web2py world (This has similar
> problems - hosting, and computation power, etc)
>
> *Option 2 / Gists, with PR based list*
>
>    - Post a slice on gist
>    - Raise a PR, with this link - this is similar to the way one raises
>    PRs to lists such as this - https://github.com/akullpp/awesome-java
>    - If someone creates a web2pyslices.github.io on this site, then you
>    have an autogenerated webpage with the curated list of slices.
>
>
> The reason am plugging for Gist based solutions is that it makes
> contribution to that Gist, or improvement in code a possibility (however
> remote).
>
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 1:23:16 AM UTC+5:30, Massimo Di Pierro
> wrote:
>>
>> web2pyslices is becoming hard to maintain. Right now the best solution is
>> to create a github repo and move all the recipes into issues. We will
>> deprecate by closing them. People with gihub accounts can post and comment
>> issues/recipes. Unless you have a better solution, this will be done within
>> the next week.
>>
>> One sideffect is that we will lose some information about authorship of
>> the recipes and the comments. We will add a notice "created by {...}" but
>> the {...} name will be the web2pyslices username and that may not mean
>> anything in the gihub context.
>>
>> At this I do not have a better solution but please share your thoughts.
>>
>> --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "web2py-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 


Carlos J. Costa
Cientista da Computação  | BS Computer Science
Esp. Gestão em Telecom   | PgC Telecom Mangement
<º))><

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to