mdipierro : Some people are interested in features as a way to get the job > done better and quicker. I am working for this second class of users. > I am interested in building a community for these people. I like that statement. Keen to see what follows up. I mean, you add neice little features every week and asure to maintain backward compatibility. But I really miss a roadmap with release dates.
mdipierro : > One is that the python community still perceives web2py as a one man > project. You people need to brag more about it and about your > contribution. True. And I guess this applies even for memebers of this list. Such posts as http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/msg/61d0e1356ac1252a are interesting. But will not change a lot until something changes in the project set up. I agre with Hans here: > We need more visibility on this, eg like Django on > http://code.djangoproject.com/#Gettinginvolved, but also the > ticket/feature requests discussed earlier. This will create better > visibility that more people are(already) contributing. For my topic of contribution I would suggest you to install pydocweb on your server: http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev/browse_thread/thread/b77ff5ed73faf410 http://code.google.com/p/pydocweb/ http://gminick.wordpress.com/ Although written in Django, it offers the great opportunity to get nice shiny and valid docstrings with doctest more sooner than later. a good notice: I was asked by my potential users to continue my app development today. Best regards, Timmie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
