Brian, In fact this is already done. I have a complete specification of each report. Just to give you an example: We are a railway company, having several hundreds of train per day. There are a lots of modifications (above 60%, Don't ask why) to the original plan where we are assigning the engines and the staff. The planning staff needs a report to see for the coming month all the tracks and track segments, with all the statuses to be able to react (definitely assign or remove/reallocate resources, etc.). So from the UI point of view even the paging is bad as they have to smoothly scroll among the data.
2016. dec. 2. 7:54 ezt írta ("Brian M" <bmere...@gmail.com>): > What Dave S. said is key >> >> "*If you had insight into what the users were looking for during their >> examination of the data*, you may be able to provide a better query that >> could *simplify the data presentation*." > > Sit down with your users and find out what it is that they *actually* > need to get their jobs done efficiently. Really take the time to work with > them to understand what they're doing and why. If they're needing to take > hundreds or even thousands of rows and mess with them in Excel then they're > clearly not being given the information they actually want/need. You might > be able to come up with improved Stored Procedure, queries or DB Views that > run faster but more importantly you can come up with improved processing > and presentation which is what ultimately matters. > > tldr; > > Be careful with this > >> "I'm teaching them to use a central too and database and *do not export >> it into a tool like Excel to manipulate the data to see "exactly" how they >> want them."* > > if you aren't giving them something that is at least pretty darn close to > what they want, or more importantly need, then you're going to have a hard > time winning them over. They won't give a hoot if it is a central tool with > a fancy database if it isn't more usable and a clear benefit to them vs > Excel, which, lets be honest, lets people do a whole lot and feel in > control. If instead you can give them a system where what they're shown is > immediately actionable that'll get them interested. Then when they see that > they didn't have to mess around in Excel, there aren't any more problems > with weird errors popping up because somebody overwrote the vital formula > in BJ:59 or a range changed messing up their summaries and they don't have > to remember how they set things up last time then they'll really be sold. > At that point they probably won't even care if the database took 5 seconds > to get the data because you just saved them 10+ minutes of fiddling with > Excel just to get started doing their job. ;) > > Why use web2py over flask, bottle, asp.Net or whatever if you've got to > use JavaScript stuff for display too? Well lets be honest, a lot of picking > frameworks really just comes down to personal preference because ultimately > they can all do the job. I happen to think that web2py is great because it > is full stack with pretty much everything included, yet isn't overly > opinionated, it's very easy to learn and work with and most importantly I > can get new screens/features up quickly. I really like having a DAL instead > of an ORM because it just seems more sensible to me, others may not, and > some like you who have to use Stored Procedure might be left out (though > the ability to easily use executesql to run custom SQL or Stored Procs is > another benefit of the DAL). The views system works well when good old HTML > is enough but you can also easily create the JSON you need to drive newer > JavaScript based stuff when needed. The FORM, SQLFORM, and the > grid/smartgrid are great, sometimes magical, especially when you're just > wanting to get something basic working quickly. But for some uses, which > unfortunately seems to include yours, those built-in grids aren't the > end-all, be-all and you really are better off with one of the client-side > JS grids that have been mentioned. Fortunately, web2py's still great for > getting the raw data, doing some server-side manipulation and transforming > it into the JSON that the JS grids, or something like AngularJS, need. > > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 7:10:32 PM UTC-6, Dave S wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 11:08:18 AM UTC-8, Gabor Nyul wrote: >>> >>> First of all thanks for the hints. >>> So it means that the web2py's integrated grid will not be suitable for >>> my needs. Bad luck. :-( >>> Then here is a stupid and somehow provocative ( :-) ) question: What is >>> the value add of web2py (compared for example to flask or bottle) if in >>> every case I have to use an external javascript library like Datatable, or >>> slickgrid, or Tabulator? >>> >>>> >>>>>> >> *Every* case? >> >> Answer 1: For many cases you can use the bundled tools. Your case isn't >> typical, it seems, because of the processing time your queries require. >> The normal case for pagination is to use ajax to update the table, with the >> query having a limitby stipulation; this is typically fast enough for most >> people. Improvement can be done by using caching, but the size of your >> results may make caching impractical. >> >> Answer 2: web2py provides a simple backend that often can get a website >> done quickly. The default frontend tools provide a good starting point for >> Datatables provides advanced frontend features that can be used to make >> the user experience feel more like a spreadsheet. Your users in particular >> may appreciate that, since they are manipulating the data presentation. >> >> If you had insight into what the users were looking for during their >> examination of the data, you may be able to provide a better query that >> could simplify the data presentation. But perhaps there is no pattern >> shared by the different users, and you'd end up with a separate query for >> each user. >> >> /dps >> >> >> >> -- > Resources: > - http://web2py.com > - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) > - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) > - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/web2py/Re4SUDrq1HQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.