I love this. It would be so cool if this was maintained with the rest of the framework and widgets could then include the generic stupid.css. The grid could use it and this would resolve a lot of issues with choice of css framework.
A couple of questions spring to mind: Does anyone need another CSS framework! Will there be enough support to keep it going? I was reminded of the doubts I had about Markmin, but this has been great and I use it a lot and it seems to have hardly required any support or huge extra effort. I am disappointed that Markmin isn't more popular, but very glad it exists. I feel that stupid.css could be a similar kind of thing. Is it intended that users use this for standard widgets and then add Bootstrap or Semantic or whatever for any extras? Its simplicity is not going to resolve every requirement. I'm not convinced about the name, but at least it is memorable! -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
