This could be a possibility. I will experiment.
On Jun 23, 6:45 am, AchipA <attila.cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could response.view also be a handle (or maybe response.viewhandle ?).
> That way we could throw a (c)StringIO at response view, and StringIO
> can wrap db fields, python strings or whatever we want.
>
> Note that response.stream already works this way so it would be
> perhaps more consequential, too.
>
> On Jun 22, 9:03 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > I should be able to di it tomorrow if no major obstacles.
>
> > Massimo
>
> > On Jun 22, 12:01 pm, Ted G <tedg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Massimo,
>
> > > I've been watching trunk. Have you had any luck with this?
>
> > > Ted
>
> > > On Jun 18, 8:31 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > not easy to do now, but easy to add. I will add this to trunk
> > > > tomorrow.
>
> > > > Massimo
>
> > > > On Jun 18, 4:30 pm, Ted G <tedg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I have an application in which I need to have the view rendered by a
> > > > > controller be specified using a parameter to that controller.
>
> > > > > I believe I could do the following based on what I've dug up in this
> > > > > forum:
>
> > > > > def index():
>
> > > > > try:
> > > > > response.view='default/' + request.args[0] # eg.
> > > > > 'indexview2.html'
> > > > > except:
> > > > > response.view='default/index.html'
>
> > > > > return dict(message=T('Hello World'))
>
> > > > > Ideally, as I come up with new view templates, I would like to upload
> > > > > them to the appropriate directory, allowing me to request an alternate
> > > > > view by simply passing the filename of the new view to this
> > > > > controller.
>
> > > > > The problem is that I am running my application on Google App Engine,
> > > > > therefore to upload new views I would have to update my application,
> > > > > which is not practical if I am frequently adding new views.
>
> > > > > The ideal solution would be to store the new view in a text or blob
> > > > > field within a table of the database and then be able to use that
> > > > > text/
> > > > > blob/string as the input to response.view instead of a file.
>
> > > > > Is this at all possible under web2py's current template processing
> > > > > (processing a view from a blobl/text/string instead of file).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
