You didn't say what web server you used for Django, whether you benchmarked compiled applications or not, etc, etc. The only way it's not apples and oranges if you use the SAME web server and compiled code. You wouldn't be using the bundled servers in a production environment anyway (that's true for both Web2py and Django). So, set them both up with, say, Apache and 2 mod_wsgi processes, deploy compiled test apps and THEN you can start to compare results.
PS for the record, I'm handling 40-50 requests per sec with a 'real' web2py (deployment optimized) site on a small Amazon EC2 instance, which is considerably lower specced then your test machine. On Jun 20, 11:23 pm, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope I'm not comparing apples with oranges. > Numbers I gave you are numbers with disabled database stuff (commented out > everything in db.py) + super simple Hello world page. > Even If I enabled database numbers should be much higher - or at least I > would expect much higher numbers. > > I know that python is not java but Django numbers are far better. > > regards > Daniel > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > You are comparing apples with oranges. By bechmarking /examples/ > > default/index you are not just benchmarking the cherrypy wsgiserver. > > You have a lot of overhead (sessions, database IO, complex template > > parsing, file IO, etc.). > > > There are different issues here: > > > - Cherrypy wsgiserver is probably as fast as Apache+mod_wsgi although > > not recommended in production (because of all the extra features of > > apache). Alache should be faster at serving static files because it > > will bypass some of the web2py logic. > > - You should make a simpler app and benchmark that > > - There are many possible optimizations in web2py that I have > > described in previous posts in this thread. > > > Massimo > > > On Jun 20, 8:21 am, carlo <syseng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Anyway I would be surprised to see CherryPy+SQLite performing slower > > > than Apache+anything else at least under moderate load. > > > > carlo > > > > On 19 Giu, 20:18, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 19 June, 16:01, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I can see that performance coming from a default integrated server is > > > > > somewhat poor. > > > > > 'integrated server' = CherryPy/SQLite, right? > > > > > > What other deployment possibilities could I test ? > > > > > ApacheWSGI/PostgreSQL would be a better comparator. > > > > > F --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
