OK. IS_STRONG it is. Uploading to trunk.
On Jun 18, 9:25 am, samwyse <samw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It returns a bool, right? So I strongly vote for the 'IS_' prefix,
> whatever else is decided. As for the rest, I initially preferred
> IS_STRONGPWD, because even when I saw the argument list I still didn't
> know what it's purpose would be. But someone else in this thread said
> it could be usable for things besides passwords (encryption keys, I
> assume), so I guess IS_STRONG is the better choice.
>
> On Jun 18, 8:43 am, DenesL <denes1...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > First of all, thanks for sharing the validator, it might come in handy
> > in the future.
> > I must agree on the name change and that now is the right time to do
> > it.
>
> > IS_STRONG() feels like a good choice since it will be checking
> > password strength, which is a function of length, complexity and
> > randomness (only the first two are being validated here, the latter
> > requires a check against well-know and last-used passwords).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
