The first step would be to add it to the web2py roadmap :-) I don't know enough about the code-base to comment on the implementation specifics. Would you see "comment" functionality being added to directly to the auth.wiki() code or developed as a separate app/plugin?
On Thursday, 6 August 2015 18:12:00 UTC+12, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > I very much agree with this. How do you propose we do it? > > On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 17:37:19 UTC-5, Limedrop wrote: >> >> I hesitate to comment on this as it's one of those topics were there's >> not "one obvious way to do it" (obviously I'm not Dutch). Essentially, I >> think google groups does an okay job and the benefits of any change are >> likely to be outweighed by the heavy cost of that change. >> >> Having said that, I've always thought that we're missing a trick by not >> integrating forum questions with the web2py book. Imagine having >> medium.com-style side comments with the book, making it more of a living >> document. Questions and answers would be right next to the relevant section >> of the book, providing further explanation and reducing RTFM answers. I >> guess you'd also add a better search facility, a stack-overflow style >> 'homepage' and possibly a slight re-structure of the book sections. Ask a >> question and it gets tagged to a book section. The book is already built >> with auth.wiki() - so we would be adding to functionality/infrastructure >> that has to be maintained anyway. >> >> We can always dream ;-) >> >> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
