You may consider, log in memory and write once you have an hundred records with scheduler...
This could be a great improve and a better log system on that matter... So far, with more then an hundred user, it never been an issue... Richard On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Leonel Câmara <leonelcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Minor implementation details aside, has anyone came up with a better way > to do this? > > > http://www.web2pyslices.com/slice/show/1618/basic-usage-statistics-log-what-your-users-do > > Particularly, in terms of not hitting the database so much. I'm thinking > of making my own system but I may as well ask before reinventing the wheel. > > -- > Resources: > - http://web2py.com > - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) > - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) > - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
