> > Comments? Pros? Cons? > > Nice. Some comments though: > > 1) /app/default/data defaults to /app/default/data/tables > with select type links for each table. > It is easy to do the same for create for example, where each link > would be a create type link for the respective table, but is it a good > idea?.
Do not understand. > 2) /app/default/select creates a ticket while > /app/default/data/select returns "404 not found" > more consistent results would be better. I can fix this. > One fix would be to move the 'tables' default response into Crud.select > (), but is it a good idea?. No because I do not expect people to exposed the full crud methods, in pasrticular it may not be a good idea to list the table names. > 3) /app/default/data.xml (or json or...) is ignored while > /app/default/data.xml/select/dog gives "invalid view" (no generic?) > 4) Should Crud offer default serializers for xml, json, ... ? are you sure you have the lastet trunk and the latest scaffolding app? these things shouldbe there. > > That's all for now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
