My understanding is that jsob is a storage format, and behind the scenes in postgres, and does not impose a change in the programming model. Or is there some other view point you wanted to share?
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 1:51:24 AM UTC+5:30, Niphlod wrote: > > watch out for all the evident shortcomings : jsonb is a lot more > restrictive than the json implementation in python we're so accustomed to. > > On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 7:01:08 PM UTC+1, Paolo Valleri wrote: >> >> I agree. we should set jsonb as default json data type for pg >= 9.4 >> I'll provide a patch as soon as possible, in the meanwhile, please open >> an issue on https://github.com/web2py/pydal/issues >> >> Paolo >> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 6:24:47 PM UTC+1, Kiran Subbaraman wrote: >>> >>> Any plans for the the postgres adapter to support *jsonb* type, by >>> default, and not the basic json type? >>> The *jsonb* type seems to have a lot more capabilities going for it, >>> than the basic json type: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-json.html >>> Indexing support, containment checks, and postgres' recommendation: >>> "..most applications should prefer to store JSON data as jsonb.." makes >>> this rather attractive to me. >>> Any thoughts? >>> >> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
