I share Massimo opinion about ractive.js: simple and effective.  The author
goal is not having a bloat of features, but rather having a foundation that
helps developers, with few clear, but powerful enough concepts, translated
in a small framework.

Besides personal preferences, it's clear to me, that the problem here is
not web2py including or not a specific client side tool.  Great confusion
arises and consequently many different approaches, frameworks, tools and so
on. IMHO thas is because of client side (browser) approach to UX:  js +
html could be not the best way to create a UX.  Most if not all of the js
frameworks around today, are a response to that problem.  My POV is that
web2py should have a rather agnostic attitude toward a wide range of
frameworks, by having some kind of layer that would allow to keep server
side code mostly untouched when changing js framework, easily add support
for a new js framework.
In practice web2py should use a well defined protocol between client and
server, to pass actions, messages and events back and forth.

In any case, following the "battery included" paradigm of web2py, we must
choose a default js framework to start with.



2014-06-20 20:13 GMT+02:00 Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com>:

> For UI i recommend Qooxdoo.
>
> Qooxdoo make us no need to write HTML and CSS , for 3 years already . We
> even forget what HTML and CSS looks like
> its javascript is so clean and truly object oriented . UI Widgets are
> professionally designed , we don't even need a  graphic designer in our
> team.
> Integration with web2py is very easy too , but we write whole view logic
> in qooxdoo and server side data by doing ajax request, to JsonRPC.
>
> It is complete, we only need specialized JSLibs like D3 and JQPlot , all
> other needs are provided by qooxdoo (From UI to AJAX LongPoll , JsonRPC,
> Databinding).
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Massimo Di Pierro <
> massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
>> Instead today my favorite client-side stack is based on these:
>>
>> - jquery.js
>> - sugar.js
>> - ractive.js
>> - semantic-ui (css & js)
>>
>> Have you tried sugar, ractive, and semantic-ui? What is your opinion?
>>
>> Massimo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Resources:
>> - http://web2py.com
>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "web2py-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "web2py-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to