On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:14:03 AM UTC+7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > Good questions. > > Web2py has changed less in the last year than in the year before and most > of the changes have been small improvements and strengthening security. In > my view web2py is a very mature project and users do not want big changes > at this point. We have some todo items including a more flexible grid, > better CSS customization. I personally did not find much to learn from > Django and Rails in the last few years instead I am much more interested in > the async capabilities of Python 3.4 >
is that mean, the web2py developers is make web2py work under python 3.x? or perhaps create the other project same like web2py that work under python 3.x > and in some javascript libraries like Angular, Ember, and Ractive (my > favorite), by hypermedia APIs, and by Semantic-UI. > > I think the future is a lighter web2py with a similar IDE but more > client-side logic out of the box and more automatic. For example I have > ported the web2py helper system (DIV, SPAN, etc.) to JS. I would like to > move form generation also clients-side. I would like move away from the MVC > and to a mini-MVC patter where an action is responsible for a single > component (for example validation) and not for an entire page. > with the movement you've mention, is it still keep the backward compatiblity for the future version of web2py? when the newer version of web2py will be released? best regards, stifan -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
