Jurgis, That is a great idea and it would be a quick solution. Ok! I don't mean to go over the deep end on this, but there are many things to consider here. What about YUM for RPM, MSI (Microsoft Installer) and OS-X packages.
Regardless of the platform package management releases, I have been thinking about the pace (fast) at which Web2Py is developed. By the time a package is sent into a package management repository (ie. Debian), the software would be very old. Has there been any discussion to modify the release cycle to something that is smoother. I'm not complaining because I like the rapid enhancements, modifications, and fixes. On the other hand, should we consider some a release process? I'm just thinking out loud and know it's another layer in the software life cycle. Bureaucracy and red tape is not a good thing in my opinion. Thank you for reading my ramblings on this. Having Web2Py in the Debian Software Repository is a good thought, but what is the final cost/benefit to it. Presently Web2Py so easy to install, even a Cave Man could do it? :-) Christopher Jurgis wrote: > > I have packaged > > web2py for debian and Ubuntu but don't have a registered status so > > can't push them into official repositories. > > would be cool, if one could download them from some universe place -- > maybe web2py.com for the start? :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
