Meta-question: Should I rather post things like this to the issue tracker?

1. 
In 
http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/32/07/forms-and-validators#Validators, 
the paragraph "IS_IN_SET" says:

The elements of the set must always be strings unless this validator is 
preceded by IS_INT_IN_RANGE (which converts the value to int) or
IS_FLOAT_IN_RANGE (which converts the value to float). For example:


requires = [IS_INT_IN_RANGE(0, 8), IS_IN_SET([2, 3, 5, 7],
          error_message='must be prime and less than 10')]

This doesn't work for me in this case:

        requires = [
            IS_INT_IN_RANGE(0, 4),
            IS_IN_SET([
                (0, T("<Option 1>")),
                (1, T("<Option 2>")),
                (2, T("<Option 3>")),
                (3, T("<Option 4>")),
                ]
            ),
        ],

I get a ticket: 

<type 'exceptions.SyntaxError'> widget cannot determine options of 
piece.piece_type

and it seems web2py tries to derive the options from the first validator:

  if hasattr(requires[0], 'options')

Changing the order in my code indeed works:

        requires = [
            IS_IN_SET([
                (0, T("<Option 1>")),
                (1, T("<Option 2>")),
                (2, T("<Option 3>")),
                (3, T("<Option 4>")),
                ]
            ),
            IS_INT_IN_RANGE(0, 4),
        ],

So should the book perhaps say:

The elements of the set must always be strings unless this validator is 
*followed* by IS_INT_IN_RANGE (which converts the value to int) or
IS_FLOAT_IN_RANGE (which converts the value to float).


?

2. In http://www.web2py.com/book/default/chapter/10#JSONRPC-and-Pyjamas 
this part of the code example

    <script language="javascript"
     src="{{=URL('static','output/pygwt.js')}}">
    </script>

for more recent versions of pyjs should be changed to

    <script language="javascript"
     src="{{=URL('static','output/bootstrap.js')}}">
    </script>

However, JSONRPC in pyjamas 0.8.x is broken (due to this problem: 
http://osdir.com/ml/python-pyjamas-devel/2012-04/msg00246.html), and it 
doesn't look like it'd be fixed any time soon (or ever).

I'd suggest to put a note on top of this chapter, to discourage people from 
trying it until pyjs development is continued, and there's a newer version 
than 0.8.1a.

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to