Maybe I'll try again in another couple of years. Perhaps third time will be the charm, eh?
On Friday, 31 January 2014 19:20:10 UTC-5, horridohobbyist wrote: > > Well, given the state of disarray that this matter is in, I'd best cut my > losses and abandon PGP email altogether. I can't wait forever for this > matter to be resolved/fixed. > > Meanwhile, perhaps the web2py book should be updated to reflect the > current lack of usability of PGP email, so that others like myself do not > waste any more time on it. The worst thing that *official* documentation > can do is to mislead the reader. > > Thanks. > > On Friday, 31 January 2014 17:25:34 UTC-5, Alan Etkin wrote: >> >> >> >>> ...the for loop is never entered. In other words, c.op_keylist_all(sender, >>> 1) is empty, so c.signers_add(sigkey) is never executed. >>> >> >>> Does that help? >>> >> >> Not much, but at least we now know that pyme (the python wrapper for the >> pgp library) cannot find any sub-key for sender, where it should. >> >> I'd open an issue at code.google.com/p/web2py with a link to this thread. >> >> BTW: pyme seems to be abandoned, there is an updated fork that is >> currently maintained: >> >> https://bitbucket.org/malb/pyme >> > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
