Keep in mind, in that post, the first method (i.e., with 1 ms responses) involved serving static files. The second method (65-75 ms) also involved storing the files on the filesystem, but they weren't served as static files (instead, they were served using web2py's built-in file upload/download mechanism). If you need to protect the files via access control, then you cannot serve them as static files.
Anthony On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:18:43 PM UTC-5, Brando wrote: > > Stifan, that is great info. pulling from the filesystem is much faster. > I think i'm going to go this route. Thanks! > > > > On Monday, January 13, 2014 7:15:22 PM UTC-8, 黄祥 wrote: >> >> please check this discussion. >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/web2py/t83nQfT24gE >> >> best regards, >> stifan >> > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
