Looks like a bug in the "|" operator method -- I think I have a fix.

Anthony

On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 1:20:15 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>
> Ok, actually, it the "|" that lead to the "problem".
>
> len(rows1)
> >>> 1
> len(rows2)
> >>> 3
>
> rows3 = rows1&rows2
>
> len(row3)
> >>> 4
>
> len(rows1)
> >>> 1
> len(rows2)
> >>> 3
>
> But 
>
> rows4 = rows1|rows2
>
> len(rows4)
> >>> 4 (in my use case)
>
> len(rows1)
> >>> 4
>
> len(rows2)
> >>> 3
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Richard Vézina 
> <ml.richa...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello Anthony,
>>
>> Not sure if it is an issue or web2py (or python) is intent to work like 
>> so... But let's say I have 2 rows sets :
>>
>> rows1 = query1
>> rows2 = query2
>>
>> rows_combined = rows1 & rows2
>>
>> rows_combined and rows1 seems to be equal, I mean rows1 seems to be 
>> containing rows2, so I can't do rows1 & rows3 and not having rows2 since 
>> they are already in rows1 case the preceding rows1 & rows2...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Richard Vézina 
>> <ml.richa...@gmail.com<javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Yes sir!!
>>>
>>> I didn't think about it, I don't need to matter with duplicate, since 
>>> each component of the union are mutually exclusive... 
>>>
>>> At least it was working with or, but very long...
>>>
>>> Thanks Anthony!!
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Anthony <abas...@gmail.com<javascript:>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:28:07 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to do union as explain the book, but it keeps running and 
>>>>> running... on row1|row2, I hava complexe query though with a lot of join 
>>>>> and subrequest...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It loops through row2 and checks whether each record already exists in 
>>>> row1, so if there are a lot of records in either and the records are 
>>>> complex, I suppose that could take a while. If you just do row1&row2 
>>>> instead, that will just combine the two sets of records without removing 
>>>> duplicates -- so if you don't need to worry about duplicates, that should 
>>>> be a lot faster.
>>>>
>>>> Anthony
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Resources:
>>>> - http://web2py.com
>>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to