There was one: http://www.web2py.com.ar/planet/. Looks like it's returning an error ticket now.
Anthony On Monday, September 9, 2013 12:39:48 PM UTC-4, Julie Bouillon wrote: > > If there's enough enough bloggers out there writing about web2py, I'll > be happy to put a "planet web2py" in place. > Just let me know if there's an interest for that. > > Julie > > On 09/07/2013 06:01 PM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > yes the number time distance between releases has increased, mostly > because the new features we are adding are more complex (or would have done > it before). > > I do not know about the number of users. > > I definitively think we need more people to blog about web2py. > > massimo > > On Saturday, 7 September 2013 05:07:53 UTC-5, LightDot wrote: >> >> I'm always sorry to see a good open source project with little or no >> documentation and a myriad of them are in this sad state. Luckily, web2py >> doesn't have this problem. >> >> The existence of the documentation is this fairly complete form is one of >> the reasons I chose web2py over other python frameworks. I don't think >> having 40 pages more or less would make me consider web2py faster or >> slower. But a lack of a chapter in the book might have made me choose >> another framework. >> >> I agree that new users need simple examples, but not at the expense of an >> in depth manual. If there is a consensus that web2py book can be >> intimidating for a complete begginer, perhaps someone can write a short "My >> first web2py project" in a book form, or something similar? I personally >> think this can be better served with blog articles and publishing of slices. >> >> Perhaps the growh of web2py userbase has slowed a bit..? I'm not sure >> that it did though. I don't have any insight into statistics to think one >> way or another and I don't trust my perception with this. >> >> What did slow down is the pace of web2py releases, hasn't it? The period >> between releases is longer than it used to be. >> >> >> On Saturday, September 7, 2013 9:54:45 AM UTC+2, webpypy wrote: >>> >>> >>> As Massimo said, " the main advantage/objective of web2py framework is >>> to be the easiest and fastest to develop web applications". >>> >>> I think the rate of growing popularity/interest was high for versions >>> < 2.0 , compared with versions >= 2.0 . >>> Maybe because of the big size of manual for versions >2.0 , The big >>> manual means it is not expected to be the easiest and fastest anymore. >>> >>> I suggest explaining the features through well documented >>> examples/appliances, keeping the manual small... >>> >>> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
