thanks. I would have swore I got this right. I am getting old. On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 02:17:12 UTC-5, Olivier Johner wrote: > > Just a little modification and all is right. > > Le lundi 15 juillet 2013 16:21:13 UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro a écrit : >> >> I made some simplification to your patch. Please check it in trunk. Thank >> you! >> >> >> On Monday, 15 July 2013 03:51:39 UTC-5, Olivier Johner wrote: >>> >>> I propose this patch >>> >>> >>> Le vendredi 12 juillet 2013 14:08:21 UTC+2, Olivier Johner a écrit : >>>> >>>> It's ok for the foreign key but when you archive records in another >>>> database, all fields comes in "big int" and raise a value error for string >>>> fields >>>> >>>> ValueError: invalid literal for long() with base 10: 'v6 box spearmint' >>>> >>>> >>>> Le dimanche 16 juin 2013 10:28:26 UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> This should now be fixed in trunk. Please check it. >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, 6 June 2013 08:19:35 UTC-5, Lamps902 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> To clarify, due to the SQL Foreign Key constraint (which is retained >>>>>> when archive tables are created through auth.enable_record_versioning), >>>>>> some of the archive database's tables still retain an association with >>>>>> the >>>>>> auth_user table's id field. However, the rows with the ids on which the >>>>>> new >>>>>> tables depend may not necessarily be transferred from the application's >>>>>> primary database to the archive database. Is there a way to use the DAL >>>>>> to >>>>>> remove the Foreign Key constraint? Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>
-- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
