Ok, no improvement on contains like search in trunk...

I will try to make a dummy app with table a fields labelled and explain how
the search could behave in case someone want to obfuscate the database
table and field names...

Richard


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Niphlod <niph...@gmail.com> wrote:

> uhm, ok. try the trunk version, then post your requirements with examples,
> and then I'll surely take a look into it, ok ?
>
>
> On Thursday, May 2, 2013 4:46:24 PM UTC+2, Richard wrote:
>
>> Maybe I should update, because with web2py 2.3.2 I can't search a la
>> "contains" in all the columns...
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Cliff Kachinske <cjk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like the latest search in grid/smartgrid a lot.  A very nice piece of
>>> work.
>>>
>>> I do have a tiny concern about exposing table names to the world at
>>> large, though.  Maybe it would be possible to obfuscate the table name by
>>> presenting the plural of the table.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 4:23:23 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wasn't know about your explanation for point 3 (contains() manner), so
>>>> this one seems to be solved. Will test if we can do, a <space that mean &>
>>>> b to make sure it search for a & b in association in all the columns
>>>> though...
>>>>
>>>> About 2, I agree with you it is a bigger challenge. But I think it
>>>> could work at least for single table, because it makes no sens to give the
>>>> same label twice into the same table. In case of join, the issue could be
>>>> solve the same way we do with web2py query adding the tablename. Only
>>>> difference we should use a label for table name there too and web2py has no
>>>> notion of table label...
>>>>
>>>> table_name_label.field_name_**la**bel !=, ==, etc. value searched
>>>>
>>>> This map into :
>>>>
>>>> table_name.field_name==value searched
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Niphlod <nip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> uhm......
>>>>> 2. seems hard but not impossible. However, what do you need
>>>>> specifically ? instead of *auth_user.first_name="hello"* just *First
>>>>> name="hello"* or *whatever suites me best=Hello*? What if some column
>>>>> names collide ?
>>>>> 3. unless you're referring to custom-coded filters in datatables.net,
>>>>> all it has is a single input that searches all fields in a "contains()"
>>>>> manner, i.e. if you put "a" in it it will filter all the rows where "a" is
>>>>> found in any column. That's what grid does by default if you put "a" in 
>>>>> the
>>>>> main input field and press "search".
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, current search widget is easy enough for every user
>>>>> out there, extremely flexibile while retaining a "quick" way to search
>>>>> through your table ..... we can shift that balance a little but up to a
>>>>> certain point: it kinda has to suite everybody's needs.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 7:59:07 PM UTC+2, Richard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did some research about SQLFORM.grid() Search Question and I
>>>>>> summarize what I found here :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Search requirements for me to use SQLFROM.grid() in place of
>>>>>> Datatables.net :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. Need to be able to search the representation for referenced
>>>>>>    fields *(Solved)*
>>>>>>    2. No database field name in the Query Builder...
>>>>>>       - I would like the labels to be used in the Query Builder and
>>>>>>       then be translated into the proper query passed to the URL *(Open,
>>>>>>       a solution seems to exist)*
>>>>>>       3. User should have the option to search over all the fields
>>>>>>    (like Datatables.net search/filter)* (Open, a solution seems to
>>>>>>    exist)*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *1)* I was searching a way to search representation of a referenced
>>>>>> field and I found this answer (from Niphold) :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How to search referenced field (query with join) :
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/**ms****g/web2py/Z4HZNNLlyYs/**lknATE2iK*
>>>>>> ***JoJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/Z4HZNNLlyYs/lknATE2iKJoJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *2)* But then, I realize that for the construction of the search the
>>>>>> user has to know the database fields names (the labels are not taking 
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> account by the query builder) in order to create his search...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I try to solve that with SQLFROM.grid headers=HEADERS_DICT, but still
>>>>>> the query constructor display the database field name and not there
>>>>>> labels...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About that issue, I found this thread that seem to address the
>>>>>> problem into a elegant way :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**foru****m/?fromgroups=#!topic/**web2py/**
>>>>>> J**VDZtZCsRTw<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/web2py/JVDZtZCsRTw>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, the solution seems to exist, but I would have to implement my own
>>>>>> or reuse this one... Did this had been (could be) added built-in in
>>>>>> SQLFORM.grid()??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *3)* I would like to preserve something I consider as a "feature".
>>>>>> Actually I use Datatables.net almost every where I need a grid, and my
>>>>>> users know how use the search/filter of Datatables, so I would have this
>>>>>> option into SQLFORM.grid()...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found this share :
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/**ms****g/web2py/9_1ECdKHKUo/**8OISg7o8O*
>>>>>> ***VIJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/9_1ECdKHKUo/8OISg7o8OVIJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, I have to test and see how it fit beside the query builder...
>>>>>> Having to different input search may be weird for user or lead to
>>>>>> misunderstanding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there other important things I should know about SQLFORM.grid()
>>>>>> and search?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the future for a better search experience with SQLFORM.grid()?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the greatest advantage of SQLFORM.grid() over other
>>>>>> Javascript grid for instance is the ability to create a search and share 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> to other user as a link... Of course there is also the possibility to
>>>>>> create more complexe query than a simple filter box. And I want these
>>>>>> features in my app.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other thread :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**foru****m/?fromgroups=#!topic/**web2py/**
>>>>>> h**Ke6lI25Bv4<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/web2py/hKe6lI25Bv4>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Related :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**foru****m/?fromgroups=#!topic/**web2py/**
>>>>>> b**ScnOfTCvL8<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/web2py/bScnOfTCvL8>
>>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to web2py+un...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**grou**ps/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to web2py+un...@**googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "web2py-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to