It is possible but very very inefficient since it would not be handled at the database level.
On Saturday, 2 February 2013 15:44:20 UTC-6, Felipe Meirelles wrote: > > I think they should, to be compatible with the default behaviour. Is this > possible to do? > > On Saturday, February 2, 2013 6:41:25 PM UTC-2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> Good point. No. they are not set to is_active=False. Should they? >> >> On Saturday, 2 February 2013 06:20:47 UTC-6, Felipe Meirelles wrote: >>> >>> No, I mean, when a record is "delete" aka is_active is seted to False, >>> the other records there make reference to it are seted false too? >>> >>> On Friday, February 1, 2013 6:19:52 PM UTC-2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>>> >>>> When using versioning. Latest versions of records are never deleted, >>>> only filtered out. I think cascade should work as expected. >>>> >>>> On Friday, 1 February 2013 11:54:25 UTC-6, Felipe Meirelles wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The cascade feature should work for record versioning enabled tables? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
