This helped me a lot understand the problem. I believe I have a fix in trunk. Can you please check if the problem is indeed solved?
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:21:21 PM UTC-6, Cliff Kachinske wrote: > > To enable archiving, I added enable_record_versioning(db) = True to my > models files. > > I encountered the problems described in the two bug reports I submitted > today on Google code. > > At one point I thought it would help with isolating the problem if I > turned off versioning, so I commented out the line enabling it. > > When I uncommented the line, I found tables with names like > "products_archive_archive." These are archive tables for the archive > tables. > > I suppose if I repeated the sequence I would have tables with names like > "products_archive_archive_archive." > > On Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:05:25 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> I do not understand. Can you explain? >> >> On Thursday, 20 December 2012 08:11:42 UTC-6, Cliff Kachinske wrote: >>> >>> I just discovered that auth.enable_record_versioning will create archive >>> tables for the archive tables if turned off and turned back on. >>> >>> Not acceptable. >>> >> --
