Anything new in trunk about nginx script except Bruno's optimization for 
12.04??

I try with the make work nginx under 12.10 with the explanation of Roberto 
De Loris without success.

I install with pip uswgi, I remove the ubuntu uwsgi package... Then I 
create a file in /etc/init/uwsgi-emperor with this :

description "uWSGI Emperor" 

start on runlevel [2345] 
stop on runlevel [!2345] 

exec uwsgi --emperor /etc/uwsgi --logto /tmp/uwsgi.log 

But it not working.

I have use the script already and then uninstall uswgi from ubuntu as I 
wrote, but there still uwsgi in /etc/init.d

When I start uwsgi-emperor I get this error :

start : Unknown job: uwsgi-emperor

Any idea?

Thanks

Richard


Le mardi 23 octobre 2012 16:38:33 UTC-4, Marco Tulio a écrit :
>
> And this is why I love this list... :)
>
> Thanks for you comments Niphlod!
>
> If anyone else has something to add, I'm all ears... 
>
> :)
>
> Cheers,
> Marco Tulio
>
> 2012/10/23 Niphlod <nip...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
>
>> PS: I really don't see the issue. Not every software come as a deb 
>> package (web2py, hello!). 
>> Roberto is very active on this and on other wsgi-related lists, and 
>> helped practically everybody with their setup. 
>>
>> What are 4 easy steps to install and forget about uwsgi updates ?
>>
>> Anyway, I switched from ubuntu/debian-based madness 
>> (/etc/uwsgi/apps-available? unreadable /etc/init.d/wsgi, etc!! ) to the 
>> emperor mode one or two months later it was available for uwsgi (took 6 
>> steps at that time, didn't have Roberto at hand at that moment :P).... 
>> I live happily with nginx+uwsgi (just because I need to serve a lot of 
>> static files + php pages + web2py applications, else I would have ditched 
>> nginx alltogether)....After all, I choose nginx also for configuration 
>> semplicity over apache, and uwsgi in emperor mode is really something you 
>> shouldn't miss. 
>>
>> Scrambling ubuntu versions just to have "the latest one" seems pointless 
>> to me: either you need some software that runs only on the newest ubuntu 
>> version or you don't upgrade. If things works, why the need to change?
>> BTW: ubuntu 12.10 is not an LTS and it's very early to say that it's a 
>> battle-tested version for production: I'm not saying you should expect 
>> breakage, but it's not uncommon if you're on the first ones who test it .
>>
>>  -- 
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> []'s
> Marco Tulio
>  

-- 



Reply via email to