Because the update may fail. -Jim
On Friday, November 9, 2012 12:20:18 PM UTC-6, Derek wrote: > > Why not just use before_update? > > On Friday, November 9, 2012 10:53:21 AM UTC-7, Jim S wrote: >> >> I'm missing something. I have a table where I want to react to changes >> to a particular field. I'm trying to use the _after_update callback check >> for this. However, using this it appears to me that I am only seeing the >> data values after the update. I can't see what they were before the update >> so I don't know which fields we actually updated. Is there a 'bef'ore' >> buffer available that I'm missing? I'm trying to capture changes made >> using a smartgrid. Any tips would be appreciated. >> >> -Jim >> > --
