Waitress? But it's not a single file. On Friday, September 28, 2012 5:38:10 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > Anyway, to my knowledge cherrypy is the only pure-python single-file > ssl-enabled web server, apart for rocket. Are there others? > > On Friday, 28 September 2012 07:37:28 UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Friday, 28 September 2012 04:57:59 UTC-5, Michele Comitini wrote: >>> >>> If we have to change, could we come up with a list of good candidates, >>> including cherrypy, and have a voting session? >>> >>> mic >>> >>> >>> >>> 2012/9/27 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Tim, creator or Rocket has not been very responsive recently. Should we >>>> revert to cherrypy wsgiserver? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:18:28 UTC-5, Michele Comitini wrote: >>>> >>>>> I confirm that is a rocket issue. After a while it starts leaving >>>>> CLOSE WAIT sockets around until consuming all available file handles. >>>>> >>>>> mic >>>>> >>>>> 2012/9/27 Niphlod <nip...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:20:03 AM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you telling us that under heavy load, trying to generate a new >>>>>>> session_id at every request using the os entropy generator >>>>>>> (/dev/urandom), >>>>>>> results in too many files open, causes tickets, and this produces the >>>>>>> apparent slow down? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you suggest? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> this is not the case within uwsgi....no errors show up. For >>>>>> production sites handling a lot concurrent requests rocket is not >>>>>> recommended. >>>>>> >>>>>> Commenting out the part generating request.uuid on main.py was part >>>>>> of "the hack" for case 5). Just commenting that turned out in a ~50 >>>>>> reqs/sec more capability. The big "speed bump" (~400 reqs/sec more) is >>>>>> removing all the session logic. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>
--
