On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:55 AM, DenesL <denes1...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > > Hi Yarko, > > I don't get what you are saying, the points were:
If following threads in email, then it is completely "ok" to "reply" and entirely change the subject line (number and all) to a now topic ---- it will be posted (when the mail is received by google groups) as a new topic with the subject you created. > > 1) You should open a new thread for a new problem. When email-posting, making a _completely_ new subject line is (completely) creating a new thread. > 2) Don't change the subject (topic in discussions page of the group), > it makes the thread harder to find for the people following it. Yes - unless, of course, you _intend_ to create a new thread. Hope this clarifies what I was trying to say. Regards, Yarko > > > Denes. > > On Apr 13, 2:40 am, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Michal Jursa <mic...@jursa.cz> wrote: > > > > > Whops, sorry, didn't know that, won't do it any more. > > > > > Michal > > > > You can do - the thread name doesn't need to have an ID number (text is > > enough) so you can reply, change subject ... just change _completely_ > ;-) > > > > > > > > > AchipA wrote: > > > > > > Discussion subject changed to "make validator ignore empty string" by > > > > Michal Jursa > > > > > > You probably sent your message as a reply to an existing, instead of > a > > > > typing a 'new' message. When you reply, the thread-id remains, so it > > > > will look funny (=harder to track) for people using threaded mail > > > > readers or those who follow the group through the web interface. > > > > > > On Apr 7, 4:29 pm, Michal Jursa <mic...@jursa.cz> wrote: > > > >> What? What have i done wrong? > > > > > >> Michal > > > > > >> DenesL wrote: > > > >>> @Michal, > > > >>> tsk... tsk... bad etiquette... hijacking other people's posts. > > > >>> You can always open a new post with your issue. > > > >>> On Apr 7, 9:47 am, Michal Jursa <mic...@jursa.cz> wrote: > > > >>>> Hi, > > > >>>> i need to make a validation like 'nothing or email', but IS_EMAIL > is > > > >>>> always complaining even on empty string. How to combine required > > > >>>> validators to do this EMPTY or EMAIL ? > > > >>>> Michal alias Plysak > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
