It is not better. It is different. It allows many2many without doing a
JOIN and that means it works on the Google App Engine without
overhead.
Massimo
On Mar 28, 3:08 pm, Kacper Krupa <pageno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yay, thanks i didn't know that is so simply.
>
> I've also next question - the field with ids (id|id|id etc) is better
> than another table which stores relations? Why / Why not?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mar 28, 8:40 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > I see at least one typo:
>
> > db.define_table('gallery',
> > SQLField('name', 'string'),
> > SQLField('images', 'string', db.image),
> > )
>
> > should be
>
> > db.define_table('gallery',
> > SQLField('name', 'string'),
> > SQLField('images', 'string'),
> > )
>
> > On Mar 28, 9:28 am, Kacper Krupa <pageno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hello,
>
> > > I wrote small gallery script, and i'm using one to many relationship.
> > > Here is the code:http://paste.pagenoare.net/default/show/62Itworked
> > > on 1.58 but on the newset (1.59) not. What is wrong? I still get
> > > ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '|1|2|' error. I
> > > seams that web2py trying add string into int field, on 58 i change
> > > type to string and it worked (as you can see on the code above).
>
> > > Thanks for any advices.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
