So this will override the normal auto id assign function.
On Mar 9, 12:41 pm, ceej <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm just saying when it comes to not using CSV import feature we
> should make it possible to do keep_in_sync_row=db.your_table.insert
> (id=my_own_id,name='test')
>
> On Mar 8, 6:52 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:05 PM, ceej <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > How would this apply not using csv and doing a manual
> > > keep_in_sync_row=db.your_table.insert(id=my_own_id,name='test') ?
>
> > Not sure what you are saying, ceej....
>
> > > On Mar 7, 8:12 pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > If the table has a field called "uuid" it is used and the record is
> > > > inserted or updated accordingly.
>
> > Massimo: currently the code in gluon/sql.py/table::import_from_csv_file()
> > is a little confusing / hard to read properly.
>
> > As is is written, there is a check for a local variable "unique"
> > (unfortunate that this is the same as an attribute name on a column in DAL),
> > which by default is set to "uuid".
>
> > The way this seems to work is if the TABLE FIELD is NAMED "uuid" (by
> > default) AND the row[column_name] value presented in the csv already exists
> > in the table, then this will update the existing row (not sure what will
> > happen is the row/column is marked unique=True in DAL, and you try to pass
> > an update to that column - even with the same data value; I worry this may
> > be problematic in general -- but maybe not...).
>
> > There's another problem with this code: since in that code, this:
>
> > if self._db(self._db[self][unique]==_unique).count():
>
> > does not check if count is > 1 (only != 0), and since there is check that
> > the data table has unique=True constraint on it, the following update:
>
> > self._db(self[unique]==_unique).update(**dict(items))
>
> > may update update may fail in any of several ways: it may update more than
> > one column, for example.
>
> > There are several ways to handle this, one being that this code should
> > confirm that the selected column has the unique=True set.
>
> > for i in self.fields:
> > if self[i].unique == True
> > # then tag this as a potential update field
> > # ... or optionally, if this matches the unique local variable,
> > # ... and that column has the unique attribute set - but ths begs
> > the question
> > # what should this do? I think unique= flag to this function
> > should be True/False --
> > # and mark this: to check for unique fields, and if so process as
> > the rest of this code does...
>
> > > > Massimo
>
> > > > On Mar 7, 6:31 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > This is really great - it only leaves the use case I outlined -
> > > updating
> > > > > rows from csv (or - in the case of UUID / name field of coupon, would
> > > this
> > > > > work that way anyway? Actually, I think so....)
>
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Actually if you restore multiple tables using
>
> > > > > > d={}
> > > > > > db.table1.import_from_csv_file(file1,d)
> > > > > > db.table2.import_from_csv_file(file3,d)
> > > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > web2py WILL FIX all your references. The new id will not be the same
> > > > > > as the old ones but the references will reflect the new ids.
> > > > > > This is achieved by storing a map between the original id and the
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > id in the d={} dictionary. Give it a try.
>
> > > > > > You can also import_to_csv_field and export_from_csv_file an entire
> > > db
> > > > > > (as opposed to an individual table) and the remapping of the ids is
> > > > > > the default behaviour.
>
> > > > > > Massimo
>
> > > > > > On Mar 7, 1:31 pm, Joe Barnhart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Well, what if I wanted to restore a database with ids used in
> > > multi-
> > > > > > > table links? From what I read of the "import csv" it discards the
> > > id
> > > > > > > field and inserts new records -- which will cause any linked
> > > records
> > > > > > > from other tables to break. Come to think of it, I'm not sure how
> > > you
> > > > > > > restore a database at all unless the ids can be set explicitly.
>
> > > > > > > At least this is one use case.
>
> > > > > > > -- Joe B.
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 5, 9:49 pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Why would anybody do such a thing? This can break the integrity
> > > of the
> > > > > > > > database.
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > Massimo
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
