I agree. it not to bad and it was not meant as a complaint. In fact I was one of the reviwers (although I did not review myself) hence I trust the process. They are using web2py for registration which is more important than anything.
Massimo On Jan 28, 8:04 am, "Sebastian E. Ovide" <sebastianov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Massimo > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:01 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > Bad news: > > - Once again, in 2009, PyCon has rejected the web2py talk and web2py > > tutorial. > > I do not see it as a bad news... it is just a delay ...! > > web2py is very young... and in PyCon there are a limited number of > conferences available... so it is normal that other frameworks with a bigger > number of fans get the chance to speak !... > > I have been playing around with web2py for a couple of weeks and I believe > that it is going in the right direction... as it has the pros of other > frameworks altogether... and furthermore and can travel with the development > environment in a USB key (that is great !!!!). The next version is very > promising too ! > > so I believe that if web2py continue in the same direction and the same > philosophy it will rich the "critical mass" of followers very soon !!! > > good job ! thanks ! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
