You are right. I did not say it was better because they use it. I am saying if you talk to a client and they say "what's jquery, why not XYZ?", if we do not have a better answer we and say "if it good enough for the white house, should be ok for you". ;-)
Massimo On Jan 22, 7:48 am, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > <flame> > Oh, because Obama's team is the authority on web development too? > Seriously! > > For that matter, they're using Microsoft to serve the page. By the same > logic, it must be better! I think I'll switch...oh wait, can't afford > it and I don't like lock in. > > Massimo, you should know better than to pick one solution to solve all > the worlds problems. > </flame> > > (I rarely resort to flames but this really chapped me.) > > mdipierro wrote: > > In case somebody ever questions our choice of jquery > > >http://keenekoncept.com/2009/01/22/whitehousegov-enters-21st-century/ > > -- > Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> > Computer Guy > Statewide General Insurance Agency (www.swgen.com) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
