I can see problems with this. But it may work. If you have a patch, let me look at it.
Massimo On Jan 8, 12:27 am, Robin B <robi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposal: if web2py/applications/*/routes.py exists, then it is joined > with web2p/routes.py if any, and the app may rewrite the sections > after the app name, (controller, function, args, kwargs). > > This would be useful for building rich/restful urls: > > /api/blogs/11/posts/22/comments.xml > > While this can be accomplished already with web2py/routes.py, the fact > is that an application like this will not work with out creating/ > modifying the global routes.py (bad), by checking for per-app routes, > apps can define nice routes that work with or without web2py/ > routes.py. > > This would allow apps to have isolated customization without modifying > or even requiring the use of global routes. > > It would be backwards compatible! > > Thoughts? > > Robin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
