from my experience pylons should be the fastest one before i notice web2py. i don't have any accurate data compare to pylons right now but i guess it shouldn't have much different i think. if u need one i'll try to build a sample benchmarking application for both pylons and web2py later.
one performance issue i notice on web2py is the sqlform/sqltable. if you have 100 fields in a table u'll notice it. it makes it hard with high concurrent visitors. although pylons' formbuilder is quite fast but it's not fair to compare as it's not that powerful/handy. and i think that can be fix easy by caching the sqlform result and replace it. oh yeah one question. web2py's DAL is non-lazy query right? -vince > @vince > do you have any data we can use to compare web2py to other frameworks? > > Massimo > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
