I know you are a reasonable man. :-) Thanks!
On Dec20, 2:02am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry I misunderstood. No objection. I will put it in. Thanks.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Dec 19, 11:59 am, Iceberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick feedback, but I don't understand. The hack only
> > introduces a new behavior, and still maintain the old behavior. IMHO,
> > a superset of feature is always backward compatible.
>
> > Not to mention that the current implementation actually contains a bug
> > (it can not accept a set although the doc said it can). We shall not
> > keep the bug for backward compatibility, shall we?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
