This is what I meant. t2 is contained and will be contained in t3.
On Dec 14, 4:11 pm, ceej <cjlaz...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I like the idea of t3 but I also really like the idea of t2, I feel t2
> should be separate from t3 and the extra features in t2 that are
> specifically for t3 should be in a separate module extending t2.
> Because t2 is a great module to plug into any application and helps
> speed up the development process. Which I think a lot of developers
> like the idea of. T3 is more of an application already for someone to
> build on top of and is ok for certain types of projects. So I really
> think we should consider "merging" t2 into t3.
>
> What are other peoples thoughts?
>
> On Dec 14, 9:51 am, Joe Barnhart <joe.barnh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In keeping with the web2py theme, a couple which come to mind are:
>
> > app2py
>
> > webapp2py
>
> > On Dec 10, 4:13 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > This is not the final word. I think we need a better name. T3 is not
> > > easily identifiable.
>
> > > Suggestions?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
