You cannot do it. I do not consider this a good software engineering practice. You reference a record, not a field. The record should therefore be referenced by its unique id.
Different is the issue of representing the reference field. You can make a join and display codice instead of id in views. Massimo On Nov 28, 9:28 am, pmate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your quick replay. > My problem is there: i don't want the relation on id of violazioni > because if i delete a record the id sequence would change. For example > in violazioni: > id codice violazione > 1 1 something > 2 2 other thing > 3 3 an other thing > > Well, if i delete id nr.2 of violazioni and insert a new record, i > want: > 1 1 something > 3 3 an other thing > 4 2 new insert > > so that i can choose my codice value (to be related on records of > table sanzioni (one to many) and not to be forced to have them > incremented like in field id would be. > > Hope to be clear... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
