Never mind, it was supported already exactly the way i was thinking it should. So passing "%(id)s, %(firstname)s %(lastname)s" as a label gives: "1, My Name"
-Marko On Nov 20, 9:11 pm, mmstud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how big change on IS_IN_DB validator would it be to support more > complicated label? My label would be something like: > > label = "%(id)s, %(firstname)s %(lastname)s" -> "1, My Name" > > That would prevent ambiguity, that is case, when listing persons with > one label only... > > I tried to create new argument called clabel and pass previous string, > but not that easy i saw ;) > > -Marko --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
