That makes sense. So would you consider T2 to be stable at this point? It seems to work well.
On Nov 18, 12:04 am, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You do not need to worry because the all idea of t2 is to have > separate modules for different functionalities that you include as > needed. t2.py is the core and it will stay small. > > Massimo > > On Nov 17, 11:08 pm, "mr.freeze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are there performance issues to consider when instantiating an entire > > tier of features (T2) vs. a modular approach? A lot of my apps seem > > to only need the web2py core and a couple of T2 features like > > authentication and user/group management. I would like to be able to > > selectively enable modules as needed. T2 is really lightweight now > > but if it grows and is truly adopted as the future of web2py, do you > > think it could bog down the framework? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
