Yes. It would not be for every URL but it should be able to distingish different causes or error (user error as invalid URL from internal error that causes a ticket).
Massimo On Oct 10, 7:55 pm, voltron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be cool if the routes were configured as a WSGI plugin as in > Pylons, but I am content, it was tough to get Massimo to allow > routing :-D. In case it does get to be re-coded as a WSGI plugin, why > place error handling in it? Would it not be better to have an error > handling plugin that "generally" routes reponse status exceptions? > That way, one would only have to set the status 400 or 404 etc handler > only once and not for every URL that might need it --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
