+1

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Henry <henry....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2 Jan 2018 7:56 AM, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wave is currently in the Apache Incubator, which has expectations of
> > how
> > > a
> > > > project matures. Wave, being a small project, over its seven years of
> > > > incubation, is not showing signs of reaching graduation. Thus, it
> seems
> > > > time we accept that the Incubator is not the place for this project.
> > > >
> > > > Retirement need not halt development - it simply means that Apache is
> > not
> > > > the venue, and the project is relieved of the constraints and demands
> > > that
> > > > Apache places upon it. Once retired, anyone can push the project
> code,
> > > for
> > > > example, to GitHub. All that is required is that the terms of the
> > Apache
> > > > License continue to be honoured.
> > > >
> > > > If the vote is to retire, then before actioning the retirement, we
> can
> > > > have a discussion on this list to see if we can reach a consensus as
> to
> > > > where the code might move to, or to see if there is a volunteer who
> is
> > > > willing to carry out the migration work.
> > > >
> > > > This vote is really aimed at members of the Wave PPMC, however
> general
> > > > votes are welcomed.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Retire Wave
> > > > [ ] 0 Abstain
> > > > [ ] -1 Keep Wave in the Apache Incubator
> > > >
> > > > Upayavira
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Regards !
Gaurav Shukla
gauravshukla.xyz

Reply via email to